I had the opportunity to interview Fred Hasselman, the main architect of casnet: An R toolbox for studying Complex Adaptive Systems and NETworks. We spoke of how compatible the complex systems perspective is with some methods widely used in social sciences.
A few notes:
- Multilevel models (and what you put in those) come in many varieties – and some are useful
- See this blog post for an overview of how multi-level survival model can be used to study early warning signals for clinical change.
- Same strategy used in physical activity research in a recent preprint of ours (includes data and code): Characterizing and predicting person-specific, day-to-day, fluctuations in walking behavior
- Interaction is not interaction
- Interaction (1): Two variables are intertwined – or “coupled” – in such a way, that they cannot be separated without severing the phenomena arising from their interplay.
- Interaction (2): A multiplicative, instead of additive, relationship in a linear regression model, where you can partial out variance and get nice beta weights for each variable to determine their individual impacts.
- The two meanings presented above are logically inconsistent: See #36 in Scott Lilienfield’s “Fifty psychological and psychiatric terms to avoid“
- See also this piece: On the distinction between interaction and effect modification
- Interdependence means you can’t use the regular statistics which social scientists know and love.
- … because you lose additivity.
- “Don’t infer causality, observe it.”
- When the system you’re looking at is an individual instead of e.g. the society, you’re in the quite happy position, that lab studies are possible (if you’re smart about them).
- An excellent paper from Merljin Olthof: Complexity in psychological self-ratings: implications for research and practice
- Additional resources:
- A symposium we held on complexity in behavioural science, evidence and policy.
- A workshop by Fred Hasselman (scroll to the end for an extensive reading list).
- University of Helsinki course by Matti: CARMA – Critical Appraisal of Research Methods and Analysis.
Because every post needs an image, here’s Julia Rohrer‘s (2017) Theory of Regulation of Empty Theories (TROETE)
One thought on “Interaction is not interaction: An interview with Fred Hasselman”
[…] Interaction is not interaction: An interview with Fred Hasselman […]